End Markets & Operations Committee Corner

During our newly reinvented End Markets & Operations Committee, Chair Will Hancock invited members to share their challenges with Alternate Daily Cover (ADC) in the marketplace. The idea for this discussion came from member feedback that more states are considering ADC equivalent to garbage, rather than a beneficial use product. The group discussed the technology used to produce various types of ADC, the important differences between utilizing MRF screenings as a byproduct versus grinding C&D to ‘manufacture’ ADC. Ideas for modifications to the product to better suit specific areas and opportunities to better educate all industry stakeholders on the benefits of ADC and C&D fines were discussed.

Related to this, how we talk about ADC and fines may be part of the problem, causing some regulators to shy away from using the product. The development of a national vocabulary to better define the products could be helpful if adopted and communicated. Professor Tim Townsend from the University of Florida agreed that coming up with a better method for identifying ADC for uses either inside or outside of the landfill could benefit the industry. He added his disappointment that the use of ADC does not generally result in any kind of environmental credit, as it can be argued that applying ADC as an alternative to virgin soil represents an environmental benefit.

Other members reminded the group that there must continue to be a financial benefit to the process of these products. Some have streamlined the processing by avoiding the intake of shingle, aggregate, and/or wallboard products. Still others have sought permits to accept solidification materials. Variances in screen size were also discussed.

Some of the content shared is expected to be offered as part of a panel discussion at the upcoming Waste Expo in Las Vegas, NV. The committee will meet again on June 5th. Make plans to join us!